Abstract

(K), as is explained, for example, in [W1] and [W2].Fontaine and Mazur [FM] conjectured that this is always the case. Significantprogress on this conjecture was achieved [W3] by proving particular instancesof the following “lifting conjecture”:Conjecture 1.1. Suppose that l is odd and that the residual represen-tation ρ¯ attached to ρ is modular. Then ρ itself is modular.Conjecture 1.1 is proved in [W3] and [TW] when K = Q and the restriction ofρ to the decomposition groups at the primes above l are semistable in the senseof [DDT, §2.4]. This is enough (using the primes l = 3 and 5) to establish theShimura-Taniyama conjecture for semistable elliptic curves, thanks to a keyresult of Langlands and Tunnell. Progressively stronger cases of Conjecture 1.1were subsequently proved by [Di], [CDT], [Fu], and [SW1]; in [SW1], Skinnerand Wiles obtain quite general results in the context where K is any totallyreal field, the principal assumption being that ρ is ordinary at the primesabove l.In this note we consider Galois representations which occur in “rigid fam-ilies”, and establish their modularity under Conjecture 1.1. This implies themodularity (over suitable real abelian extensions) of the Galois representationsoccurring in the cohomology of the curvesy

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.