Abstract

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) describe the progression of transcriptional states that take a single-celled zygote to a multicellular organism. It is well documented that GRNs can evolve extensively through mutations to cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). Transcription factor proteins that bind these CRMs may also evolve to produce novelty. Coding changes are considered to be rarer, however, because transcription factors are multifunctional and hence are more constrained to evolve in ways that will not produce widespread detrimental effects. Recent technological advances have unearthed a surprising variation in DNA-binding abilities, such that individual transcription factors may recognize both a preferred primary motif and an additional secondary motif. This provides a source of modularity in function. Here, we demonstrate that orthologous transcription factors can also evolve a changed preference for a secondary binding motif, thereby offering an unexplored mechanism for GRN evolution. Using protein-binding microarray, surface plasmon resonance, and in vivo reporter assays, we demonstrate an important difference in DNA-binding preference between Tbrain protein orthologs in two species of echinoderms, the sea star, Patiria miniata, and the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Although both orthologs recognize the same primary motif, only the sea star Tbr also has a secondary binding motif. Our in vivo assays demonstrate that this difference may allow for greater evolutionary change in timing of regulatory control. This uncovers a layer of transcription factor binding divergence that could exist for many pairs of orthologs. We hypothesize that this divergence provides modularity that allows orthologous transcription factors to evolve novel roles in GRNs through modification of binding to secondary sites.

Highlights

  • Animal morphology arises under the control of interacting networks of regulatory genes that operate during embryonic development

  • It stands to reason that mutations to cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) have fewer pleiotropic effects and are more likely to pass the filter of selection and these become the source of novelty and change

  • P. miniata, tbrain (PmTbr) was originally isolated from a cDNA library probed with a cDNA clone corresponding to another T-box factor, PmBrachyury (PmBra) (Hinman, Nguyen, Cameron, et al 2003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal morphology arises under the control of interacting networks of regulatory genes that operate during embryonic development. Several influential articles, published almost 50 years ago, set forth the hypothesis that noncoding DNA, that is, the cis regulatory DNA, would be the predominant source of evolutionary change. This idea was first predicted by Monod and Jacob (1961) who emphasized the important distinction between biochemical protein function and context of the action of that protein. The transcription factors that utilize these CRMs must remain evolutionarily dormant because they often are needed to orchestrate a variety of crucial tasks This tends to be especially evident during development where transcriptions factors are used in multiple contexts. It stands to reason that mutations to CRMs have fewer pleiotropic effects and are more likely to pass the filter of selection and these become the source of novelty and change (reviewed in Carroll 2005; Prud’homme et al 2007; Wray 2007)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call