Abstract

The Law of Marriage Act [LMA] is a product of integration of personal laws. From inception, the LMA vested original concurrent jurisdiction in matrimonial proceedings to the High Court, a court of a resident magistrate, a district court, and a primary court under section 76. It vested Primary Courts to civil related matters under section 75. This legal position has all along been in force over six decades now without challenges. Recently, the High Court of Tanzania in the cases of Hamisi Ammri, Burton Nyerema, and Ester Rogatio, held that district courts have no jurisdiction of handling matrimonial disputes based on customary marriage without first seeking for leave of the High Court. Primary Courts on the other hand, have been held to have no powers of handling matrimonial disputes based on civil marriages. This paper has reviewed related literature, case law, updated statute indices, and observed that no amendment has so far been made on the LMA. It is argued that the High Court decisions in the named above cases were made in error. It recommends that the Court of Appeal, suo motu by way of revision or by exercising supervisory powers, be pleased to rectify the situation in order to maintain certainty in the administration of justice in matrimonial disputes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.