Abstract

In the social sciences as elsewhere, modern science is widely assumed to be a successful and progressive enterprise. Sociologists of science tend to be science advocates, and students of social problems implicitly treat science as a “healthy” institution. Science critics are often opposed to “distorted” versions of science but not to “true” science. A few social critics, however, have argued that modem science is the product of an alienated human spirit and a factor in rather than a solution to our individual and social problems. In line with this perspective, I draw on C. Wright Mills's conception of the Science Machine and related ideas to argue that modern science is a social problem. This argument is grounded in a constructivist (but not relativist) view of science and scientific knowledge, critiques of the myth of pure science and the idea of scientific progress, and an assessment of the limits of science criticism (including feminist criticism).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.