Abstract
This chapter argues that modern and medieval representation are different ways of life, not merely different kinds of representative machinery, and that the difference is most visible in the secularism of modern representation. Political or philosophical opinion once held that representative government is a modern artifice, and scholarly opinion holds that it is a medieval inheritance. By serving as the medieval contribution to human freedom, representative government was useful to the opinion that man has a history rather than a fixed nature, but it was also necessary to that opinion. The secularism of modern representation explains its strange attachment to both limited government and absolute sovereignty. Because the people of modern representation have no ruling part it does not follow that modern representation is democratic. To distinguish modern from medieval representation one must define modern representation and know its medieval sources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.