Abstract

Pore fluid overpressures in active fault systems can drive fluid flow and cause fault weakening and seismicity. In return, deformation accommodated by different modes of failure (e.g. brittle vs. ductile) also affects fault zone permeability and, hence, fluid flow and pore fluid pressure distribution. Current numerical simulation techniques model how fluid flow controls fault reactivation and associated seismicity. However, the control exerted by pore fluid pressure on the transition from slow aseismic fault sliding to fast seismic sliding, during the earthquake nucleation phase, is still poorly understood. Here, we model overpressured, supercritical CO2 fluid flow in natural faults, where non-linear, complex feedback between fluid flow, fluid pressure and fault deformation controls the length of the nucleation phase of an earthquake and the duration of the interseismic period. The model setup is an analogue for recent seismic source events in the Northern Apennines of Italy (e.g. Mw 6.0 1997-98 Colfiorito and Mw 6.5 2016 Norcia earthquakes). Our modelling results of Darcy fluid flow show that the duration of the nucleation phase can be reduced by orders of magnitude, when realistic models of fault zone architecture and pore pressure- and deformation-dependent permeability are considered. In particular, earthquake nucleation phase duration can drop from more than 10 years to a few days/minutes, while the seismic moment can decrease by a factor of 6. Notably, the moment of aseismic slip (M0=109Nm) obtained during the nucleation phase modelled in our study is of the same order as the detection limit of local strain measurements using strain meters. These findings have significant implications for earthquake early warning systems, as the duration and moment of the nucleation phase will affect the likelihood of timely precursory signal detection. Interestingly, aseismic slip has been measured up to a few months before some recent large earthquakes, although in a different tectonic context than the model developed here, rekindling interest in the nucleation phase of earthquakes. In addition, our results have important implications for short and long term earthquake forecasting, as crustal fluid migration during the interseismic period may control fault strength and earthquake recurrence intervals.

Highlights

  • Pore fluid pressure plays a primary mechanical role during faulting as it reduces the frictional fault strength (Cox, 2010; Sibson, 1992)

  • The fault core shows a complex structure, with a 1 m wide inner fault core (IFC) domain, containing fine-grained cohesive cataclasites, which is enclosed on both sides by 2 m wide outer fault core (OFC) domains (Fig. 1b), containing cohesive and continuous foliated anhydrites, which are not fractured, and lenses of fractured dolomite dispersed within the foliated anhydrites (De Paola et al, 2008)

  • Fluid flow in the fault core during the interseismic period is modelled for two end-member scenarios, Case A and B

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pore fluid pressure plays a primary mechanical role during faulting as it reduces the frictional fault strength (Cox, 2010; Sibson, 1992). Snell et al / Earth and Planetary Science Letters 530 (2020) 115869 to estimate the maximum sustainable injection pressure during geological sequestration of CO2 (Rutqvist et al, 2007) In these studies, fluid flow was modelled for metre to kilometre scale fault zone features, considering permeability as a continuous function of porosity, volumetric strain, average effective stress, and fault shear strain. We model fluid flow in exhumed (>1 km depth), large displacement (>100 m) faults in evaporite sequences with complex architecture, and pore pressure- and deformation-dependent permeability (De Paola et al, 2008; Collettini et al, 2009) These faults represent an analogue of the seismic sources at hypocentre depth of recent seismic events in the Northern Apennines of Italy (e.g. Mw 6.0 1997-98 Colfiorito and Mw 6.5 2016 Norcia earthquakes). Modelling pore fluid pressure evolution during the interseismic period has relevant implications for long term earthquake forecasting, as it controls fault strength and earthquake recurrence intervals

Numerical method
Porous media flow and numerical solution
Model input parameters
Model setup
Results
Pore pressure evolution and onset of failure
Pore pressure evolution and earthquake nucleation
Pore fluid factor control
Discussion and conclusions
Implications for fluid induced earthquake nucleation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call