Abstract

Theoretical models of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) concentration-response relationships often assume an agonist producing a single functional response via a single active state of the receptor. These models have largely been analysed assuming steady-state conditions. There is now much experimental evidence to suggest that many GPCRs can exist in multiple receptor conformations and elicit numerous functional responses, with ligands having the potential to activate different signalling pathways to varying extents–a concept referred to as biased agonism, functional selectivity or pluri-dimensional efficacy. Moreover, recent experimental results indicate a clear possibility for time-dependent bias, whereby an agonist’s bias with respect to different pathways may vary dynamically. Efforts towards understanding the implications of temporal bias by characterising and quantifying ligand effects on multiple pathways will clearly be aided by extending current equilibrium binding and biased activation models to include G protein activation dynamics. Here, we present a new model of time-dependent biased agonism, based on ordinary differential equations for multiple cubic ternary complex activation models with G protein cycle dynamics. This model allows simulation and analysis of multi-pathway activation bias dynamics at a single receptor for the first time, at the level of active G protein (αGTP), towards the analysis of dynamic functional responses. The model is generally applicable to systems with NG G proteins and N* active receptor states. Numerical simulations for NG=N*=2 reveal new insights into the effects of system parameters (including cooperativities, and ligand and receptor concentrations) on bias dynamics, highlighting new phenomena including the dynamic inter-conversion of bias direction. Further, we fit this model to ‘wet’ experimental data for two competing G proteins (Gi and Gs) that become activated upon stimulation of the adenosine A1 receptor with adenosine derivative compounds. Finally, we show that our model can qualitatively describe the temporal dynamics of this competing G protein activation.

Highlights

  • Mathematical modelling and scientific computing are powerful tools for the analysis of cell signalling in pharmacology

  • For wild-type cells the log concentration response curves for the inhibition of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) show non-monotonic behaviour with a downturn at higher concentrations, whereas the log concentration response curves for the production of cAMP in pertussis toxin (PTX)-treated cells show, with the exception of one data point for the NECA experiment, monotonic behaviour

  • Since cAMP is produced in response to Gs activation (Barritt, 1992; Leander and Friedman, 2014), for a simple, minimal model of cAMP levels in PTX-treated cells, with blocked cAMP degradation, we take the cAMP production rate proportional to α subunit bound to guanosine triphosphate (αGTP), s levels, so that d[cAMP] dt

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mathematical modelling and scientific computing are powerful tools for the analysis of cell signalling in pharmacology. The dynamics in Chen et al (2003) are not examined in detail, but extensive analysis of GPCR signalling dynamics has been presented elsewhere (Bridge et al, 2010; Woodroffe et al, 2010; 2009), for mathematical models which allow G proteins binding to inactive receptors, and constitutive receptor activity. In these models, the active G protein α subunit bound to guanosine triphosphate (αGTP).

Model formulation
Simulation results
Time courses
Ligand is an agonist for both pathways
Ligand is agonist for one pathway and antagonist for the other
Ligand is agonist for one pathway and inverse agonist for the other
Time course surfaces
Concentration-response relationships
Detecting and quantifying bias
Bias factors and the operational model of agonism
Bias factor’s dependence on ζ and ν
Kinetic context and dynamic bias factors
Bias dynamics beyond the operational model of agonism
Fitting to a model of downstream functional antagonism via biased signalling
Experimental method
Experimental results
Modelling considerations
Parameter estimation
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call