Abstract

Using a cell-free bioluminescence resonance energy transfer strategy we compared the levels of spontaneous and ligand-induced receptor-G protein coupling in δ (DOP) and μ (MOP) opioid receptors. In this assay GDP can suppress spontaneous coupling, thus allowing its quantification. The level of constitutive activity was 4-5 times greater at the DOP than at the MOP receptor. A series of opioid analogues with a common peptidomimetic scaffold displayed remarkable inversions of efficacy in the two receptors. Agonists that enhanced coupling above the low intrinsic level of the MOP receptor were inverse agonists in reducing the greater level of constitutive coupling of the DOP receptor. Yet the intrinsic activities of such ligands are identical when scaled over the GDP base line of both receptors. This pattern is in conflict with the predictions of the ternary complex model and the "two state" extensions. According to this theory, the order of spontaneous and ligand-induced coupling cannot be reversed if a shift of the equilibrium between active and inactive forms raises constitutive activation in one receptor type. We propose that constitutive activation results from a lessened intrinsic barrier that restrains spontaneous coupling. Any ligand, regardless of its efficacy, must enhance this constraint to stabilize the ligand-bound complexed form.

Highlights

  • Native subtypes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) show different levels of constitutive activation

  • If we evaluate the variation with respect to the level of constitutive coupling, the same loss of efficacy converts agonists into inverse agonists at the DOP receptor but only reduces agonism at the MOP receptor

  • In this study we have compared the activity of a congeneric series of ligands for wild-type DOP and MOP receptors using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based measurement of receptor-G protein interaction in membranes

Read more

Summary

Background

Native subtypes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) show different levels of constitutive activation. Using a cell-free bioluminescence resonance energy transfer strategy we compared the levels of spontaneous and ligand-induced receptor-G protein coupling in ␦ (DOP) and ␮ (MOP) opioid receptors. In this assay GDP can suppress spontaneous coupling, allowing its quantification. We evaluated the differences in spontaneous and ligand-regulated coupling between ␮ (MOP) and ␦ (DOP) opioid receptors [23, 24], using 35 analogues that share a common peptidomimetic scaffold This is derived from the condensation of the two unnatural amino acids, 2Ј,6Ј-dimethyltyrosine (Dmt) and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid (Tic). According to such a view, constitutive activation of the receptor results from the intramolecular lessening of a constraint that all ligands must oppose to stabilize the ligand-bound receptor-G protein complex

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call