Abstract
As more end-user applications depend on Internet of Things (IoT) technology, it is essential the networking protocols underpinning these applications are reliable. Using Formal Methods to reason about protocol specifications is an established technique, but, due to their perceived difficulty and mathematical nature, receive limited use in practice. We propose an approach based on Milner’s bigraphs—a flexible diagrammatic modelling language—that allows developers to “draw” the protocol updates as a way to increase use of formal methods in protocol design. To show bigraphs in action, we model part of the Routing Protocol for low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL), popular in wireless sensor networks, and verify it using model checking. We compare our approach with the more common simulation approach, and show that analysing the bigraph model often finds more valid routes than simulation (that usually returns only a single routing tree even with 500 simulations), and that it has comparable performance. The model is open to extension, with less implementation effort than simulation, and we show this through two examples: a security attack and physical link drops. Bigraphs seem a promising approach to protocol design, and this is the first step in promoting their use.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
