Abstract
AbstractModeling strategies for simulated moving bed adsorbers were studied to compare the simulated moving bed model (SMB) that considers the real shift of the injection and collection points to the true moving bed approach (TMB) that considers liquid and solid flow in opposite directions. The prediction of these two models is compared in terms of steady‐state performance, steady‐state internal concentration profiles, and transient behavior of the extract and raffinate purities. The influence of the degree of subdivision of the bed in the SMB model predictions is also analyzed and compared with the TMB performance. Model results are compared with experimental results obtained for the chromatographic separation of binaphthol enantiomers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
