Abstract

Evaporation is a very important process; it is one of the most critical factors in agricultural, hydrological, and meteorological studies. Due to the interactions of multiple climatic factors, evaporation is considered as a complex and nonlinear phenomenon to model. Thus, machine learning methods have gained popularity in this realm. In the present study, four machine learning methods of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were used to predict the pan evaporation (PE). Meteorological data including PE, temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (W), and sunny hours (S) collected from 2011 through 2017. The accuracy of the studied methods was determined using the statistical indices of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (R) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Furthermore, the Taylor charts utilized for evaluating the accuracy of the mentioned models. The results of this study showed that at Gonbad-e Kavus, Gorgan and Bandar Torkman stations, GPR with RMSE of 1.521 mm/day, 1.244 mm/day, and 1.254 mm/day, KNN with RMSE of 1.991 mm/day, 1.775 mm/day, and 1.577 mm/day, RF with RMSE of 1.614 mm/day, 1.337 mm/day, and 1.316 mm/day, and SVR with RMSE of 1.55 mm/day, 1.262 mm/day, and 1.275 mm/day had more appropriate performances in estimating PE values. It was found that GPR for Gonbad-e Kavus Station with input parameters of T, W and S and GPR for Gorgan and Bandar Torkmen stations with input parameters of T, RH, W and S had the most accurate predictions and were proposed for precise estimation of PE. The findings of the current study indicated that the PE values may be accurately estimated with few easily measured meteorological parameters.

Highlights

  • Pan evaporation (PE) is usually affected by the thermal energy and the vapor pressure gradient, which depends mainly on meteorological parameters [1]

  • The results revealed that the best structure of the model obtained with four input data including air temperature, water surface temperature, sunny hours, and air pressure; wind speed and relative humidity have a low correlation with the evaporation in the study area

  • Based on the results obtained at Gorgan Station, GPR7 with meteorological data of T, relative humidity (RH), W, and S has the lowest error with Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 1.244 mm/day, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 0.958 mm/day, and R = 0.901 and selected as the most accurate method among the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pan evaporation (PE) is usually affected by the thermal energy and the vapor pressure gradient, which depends mainly on meteorological parameters [1]. In the recent years, machine learning methods have been implemented and applied successfully for PE estimation according to their superior capabilities in learning nonlinear and complex interactions of this phenomenon, which are difficult for empirical models In this regard, Keskin and Terzi [14] studied the meteorological data of the stations near the lake in western Turkey to determine the daily PE using the neural network model. Feng et al [26] examined the performance of two solar radiation-based models for the estimation of daily evaporation in different regions of China They suggested that Stewart’s model can be preferred when the meteorological data of sunny hours and air temperature are available. Using performance evaluation indices, the best method is obtained for estimating evaporation in the humid regions of Iran

Study Area
Materials and Methods
K-Nearest-Neighbor-IBK
Model Development
Evaluation Parameters
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.