Abstract

Fluidic artificial muscles (FAMs), also known as McKibben actuators, are a class of fiber-reinforced soft actuators that can be pneumatically or hydraulically pressurized to produce muscle-like contraction and force generation. When multiple FAMs are bundled together in parallel and selectively pressurized, they can act as a multi-chambered actuator with bioinspired variable recruitment capability. The variable recruitment bundle consists of motor units (MUs)—groups of one of more FAMs—that are independently pressurized depending on the force demand, similar to how groups of muscle fibers are sequentially recruited in biological muscles. As the active FAMs contract, the inactive/low-pressure units are compressed, causing them to buckle outward, which increases the spatial envelope of the actuator. Additionally, a FAM compressed past its individual free strain applies a force that opposes the overall force output of active FAMs. In this paper, we propose a model to quantify this resistive force observed in inactive and low-pressure FAMs and study its implications on the performance of a variable recruitment bundle. The resistive force behavior is divided into post-buckling and post-collapse regions and a piecewise model is devised. An empirically-based correction method is proposed to improve the model to fit experimental data. Analysis of a bundle with resistive effects reveals a phenomenon, unique to variable recruitment bundles, defined as free strain gradient reversal.

Highlights

  • 137.9 kPa in 34.5 kPa intervals are shown as resistive force, bearing more significance in low pressure ranges

  • In the resistive force regime, a good agreement is observed between the experiments and the corrected model

  • Free strains for constant pressure force curves past 137.9 kPa occur closer to the maximum free strain and do not show the collapse of the bladder

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The actuator can be said to be stable in open loop in response to constant pressure, while any displacement from its equilibrium state results in an opposing force [1]. It can be characterized as an active spring, a classification that can be applied to a biological muscle, which is why it is commonly referred to as a fluidic artificial muscle (FAM), a term that will be used interchangeably in this paper

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call