Abstract
Abstract. International water resources agreements for transboundary rivers in southern Africa are generally founded in system analysis models for water planning and allocation. The Water Resources Yield Model (WRYM) developed in South Africa has so far been the only model applied in official joint water resources studies aimed to form water-sharing agreements. The continuous discussion around the model performance and growing distress over it being South African, where it was originally developed, while South Africa is one of the interested parties in the process, results in an increased controversy over the system analysis results that are often only meant to guide in selecting the options for water resources management in a given set of scenarios. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the model performance of two other models; WAFLEX and WEAP21 in the Umbeluzi River Basin system where the WRYM was previously applied as part of a Joint River Basin Study. A set of basin development scenarios was equally tested in the three models and the results compared. The results show that the three models all are possible tools for system analysis of river basins in southern Africa, although the structure and complexity of the models are different. The obtained level of satisfaction for specific water users could, however, vary depending on which model was used, which causes uncertainties. The reason for the diverse results is the structurally different ways of describing allocation and prioritization of water in the three models. However, the large degrees of freedom in all system models cause even larger uncertainty in the results since the model developer can, intentionally or unintentionally, direct the results to favor certain water user. The conclusion of this study is therefore that the choice of model does not per se affect the decision of best water allocation and infrastructure layout of a shared river basin. The chosen allocation and prioritization principles for the specific river basin and the model developer's experience and integrity are more important factors to find the optimal and equitable allocation.
Highlights
Water resources systems are generally complex with both qualitative and quantitative factors governing water resources availability (Raju and Pillai, 1999)
As a case study it was chosen to do the assessment in the Umbeluzi River in which the Water Resources Yield Model (WRYM) has previously been set up as part of the Joint Umbeluzi River Basin Study (JURBS) that aimed to prepare the baseline for a new water resources sharing agreement between Swaziland and Mozambique (SWECO and Associates, 2005)
The models can provide estimates of the available water resources for different demand and infrastructure scenarios taking into account the climatic variability of southern Africa
Summary
Water resources systems are generally complex with both qualitative and quantitative factors governing water resources availability (Raju and Pillai, 1999). In southern Africa the high climatic variability further adds the complexity. Both the large seasonal variations and the interannual variations, with long dry spells, make infrastructural solutions necessary to assure water availability at all times. Building infrastructures will not on its own ensure water availability and equitable water allocation between countries and users of a particular river basin. In southern Africa, decision on water resources permit allocation between different users and between different riparian countries is commonly based on system analysis tools.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have