Abstract
A multivariate generalization of the log-normal model for response times is proposed within an innovative Bayesian modeling framework. A novel Bayesian Covariance Structure Model (BCSM) is proposed, where the inclusion of random-effect variables is avoided, while their implied dependencies are modeled directly through an additive covariance structure. This makes it possible to jointly model complex dependencies due to for instance the test format (e.g., testlets, complex constructs), time limits, or features of digitally based assessments. A class of conjugate priors is proposed for the random-effect variance parameters in the BCSM framework. They give support to testing the presence of random effects, reduce boundary effects by allowing non-positive (co)variance parameters, and support accurate estimation even for very small true variance parameters. The conjugate priors under the BCSM lead to efficient posterior computation. Bayes factors and the Bayesian Information Criterion are discussed for the purpose of model selection in the new framework. In two simulation studies, a satisfying performance of the MCMC algorithm and of the Bayes factor is shown. In comparison with parameter expansion through a half-Cauchy prior, estimates of variance parameters close to zero show no bias and undercoverage of credible intervals is avoided. An empirical example showcases the utility of the BCSM for response times to test the influence of item presentation formats on the test performance of students in a Latin square experimental design.
Highlights
In various research settings, it is of interest to make inferences about the effect of a treatment or experimental condition on a certain population
In the random-effects model specified in Eq (30) and the proposed Bayesian Covariance Structure Model (BCSM) specified in Eq (32), the assumption of local independence is violated if the testletvariance is not equal to zero
The BCSM framework allows the specification of models based on, but not limited to, an integrated likelihood approach
Summary
It is of interest to make inferences about the effect of a treatment or experimental condition on a certain population. A marginal model is appropriate when inferences about population-averages (e.g., comparing means or (co)variances across groups) are the goal of research (Diggle, Heagerty, Liang, & Zeger 2013). Unlike in their conditional counterpart, in a marginal framework the person effects are not modeled; they are integrated out. If inferences about population-averages are the focus of research, a marginal approach greatly favors the parsimony of the model at hand and can offer several advantages in the context of parameter estimation and model selection
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have