Abstract

Longitudinal data structures are frequently encountered in a variety of disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences. Growth curve modeling offers a highly extensible framework that allows for the exploration of rich hypotheses. However, owing to the presence of interrelated sources of potential data-model misfit at multiple levels, the matter of model criticism remains challenging for even foundational growth curve models. Through a simulation study and an applied example, the performance of six discrepancy measures was investigated using posterior predictive model checking as the framework for model criticism. The likelihood ratio and the standardized generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure outperformed the other discrepancy measures under consideration and show promise for future study and use.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.