Abstract

ABSTRACTIt has been argued that, in light of some of the weaknesses of post-apartheid democracy, social movements have the potential to provide a more meaningful practice of citizenship and democracy for those living on the socio-economic margins of society. However, analysts have often not interrogated how these practices unfold in the day-to-day rhythms of collective action. This article uses the concept of ‘insurgent citizenship’ as a lens through which to analyse the mobilisation practices of one community-based organisation affiliated to the Anti-Privatisation Forum (APF). Through examining how concerns over safety and security resulted in practices of everyday policing, more commonly termed vigilante justice, within the Protea Court Residents Committee (PCRC), the article demonstrates how insurgent mobilisation practices can become entangled with anti-democratic and patriarchal forces. In teasing out some of the contradictions of insurgent citizenship, this article offers a critical analysis, seeking neither to celebrate nor condemn the practices it examines. Rather, I argue that if we are to take the progressive potential of insurgent citizenship practices seriously then we must be alive to its contradictions and limitations as it is enacted within everyday mobilisation practices.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.