Abstract
In May 2023, The Guardian announced that babies had been born through mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT). MRT and its ethical and legal implications have been discussed in the media for over a decade. These discussions have been examined by social scientists and communication scholars. In this article, we seek to determine whether and, if so, how social representations have changed since this announcement. Using thematic analysis and social representations theory, we studied a corpus of 70 English language newspaper articles. Results show three thematic dichotomies: (1) moderation vs. sensationalism; (2) ontologising vs. de-ontologising MRT; and (3) using metaphors for persuasion vs. explanation. The societal concern representation largely dominated reporting around 2015 and the hope and opportunity representation was prominent in current reporting. We argue that the hope representation may facilitate greater patient and public acceptance of MRT but that it may also limit awareness, understanding and discussion of its possible risks and limitations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.