Abstract

Abstract Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas, which tends to accumulate inside built structures. It is therefore necessary to include techniques to mitigate radon concentration during refurbishing work. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a number of mitigation techniques, under real conditions, to determine which is most suitable, in each case, for use in rebuilding solutions. The methodology consisted in performing four experimental tests on mitigation strategies recommended by the Código Técnico de la Edificación (Technical Building Code) (CTE-DB-HS6) and by the Government of the Autonomous Community of Galicia, (Xunta de Galicia, 2018). The concentration was measured with three different systems: radon in soil at 80 cm, passive detectors to confirm mean concentration, and continuous monitoring by devices calibrated at the LaRUC Laboratory of the University of Cantabria, in order to compare the results of the tests. The experiments were carried out in premises located in a high radiation area in Arteixo (La Coruña, Spain). Four experimental models were designed, corresponding to each of the building solutions under study, and tested over a period of 16 days in two repeated series of trials. The results obtained show that, of the different strategies tested, pressurising the living space achieves an efficient reduction of the radon concentration with a significant simplicity of construction. This solution, compatible with the minimal intervention and reversibility principles stablished in the charters of Venice, Krakovia and Nara, is shown to be especially useful when work is carried out on structures considered to be part of protected heritage.

Highlights

  • Radon gas build-up inside buildings is one of the leading causes of death from lung cancer in non-smokers

  • This solution, compatible with the minimal intervention and reversibility principles stablished in the charters of Venice, Krakovia and Nara, is shown to be especially useful when work is carried out on structures considered to be part of protected heritage

  • It is simple to introduce, the materials are cheap and available, and it can be done quickly. This solution, is shown to be compatible with the minimal intervention and reversibility principles stablished in the charters of Venice, Krakovia and Nara, especially on buildings considered to be part of protected heritage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radon gas build-up inside buildings is one of the leading causes of death from lung cancer in non-smokers. Concentrations of 200 Bq/m3 may be a risk factor for this disease [1,2,3,4]. It is estimated that between 15 % and 25 % of cases of this disease stem from this specific building pathology. This value is below the limit of 300 Bq/m3 set out in the Directive 2013/59/EURATOM [5] and doubles the 100 Bq/m3 given as the reference level for minimising health risks from indoor exposure to radon [6, 7]. Recommendations published by national and international public bodies for radon mitigation include a selection of solutions based on different strategies [8, 9]: ventilation of premises, positive pressurisation of premises and soil, depressurisation of the soil beneath the structure, and impermeable barriers, see Fig. 1.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call