Abstract
Work alienation, driven by powerlessness, meaninglessness, social isolation, and self-estrangement, negatively affects job performance and wellbeing. Yet it remains under-researched. This paper elaborates on alienation theory by exploring it in a novel context – employee-owned firms – and contributes to employee ownership, psychosocial work environment, and employee relations literature. Based on interviews with 33 employees, we reveal structural, psychological, and cultural characteristics that suppress alienation. Psychological and structural empowerment create perceptions of powerfulness. Psychological ownership, effort-reward balance, and prosocial values provide meaningfulness. Community, equality, and inclusive discourse lead to belonging, while personal development, ethic of care, and authenticity drive self-realization. Since these characteristics need not be exclusive to co-ownership, the study provides insights to conventional firms on how to foster organisational belonging. A further contribution to theory and practice is our identification of tensions inherent in co-ownership, arising from information sharing, decision-making, distributive justice, and organizational citizenship behaviour, that inadvertently drive alienation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.