Abstract
Shall is one of the most important words in legal English text, and is supposed to be used to impose a mandatory duty.However, in the translated English version of China’s laws or statutes, shall is misused or overused. Some scholarshave been suggesting that shall should be eliminated from legal English language, and replaced with other properwords, such as must. This paper studies the grammar relating to shall and misuse of shall in the translated Englishversion of China’s laws and statutes, and suggests that shall, as an important word in legal English vocabulary,should serve as the only means of imposing obligations on the subject capable of carrying out obligations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
