Misconceptions in IONM Part II: Does Anodal Blocking Occur and Is Bipolar Stimulation Necessary with Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials?

Abstract

ABSTRACT Current intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) guidelines recommend bipolar stimulation with the anode at or near the crease of the wrist and the cathode 2–4 cm proximal to the anode for median nerve SSEPs. The rationale for this cathode proximal bipolar configuration appears to be the avoidance of anodal blocking; however, there is a paucity of experimental support for the existence of anodal blocking. Evidence that bipolar stimulation preferentially drives stimulation from the cathode better than monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal in peripheral nerves in human neurophysiology is also lacking. This study compared anode proximal to anode distal bipolar stimulation of median nerve SSEPs and the efficacy of monopolar cathode to monopolar anode stimulation in generating median, ulnar, and tibial nerve SSEPs. No difference in median nerve cortical SSEP amplitude was observed between anode proximal and anode distal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal stimulation suggesting cathode proximal bipolar is equal to anode proximal bipolar stimulation at supramaximal intensity. This data suggests that anodal blocking does not occur inintraoperative SSEPs. Furthermore, no differences were observed in ulnar, median, and tibial nerve SSEP cortical or subcortical amplitudes and latencies between monopolar cathodal or monopolar anodal stimulation suggesting monopolar cathode and anode stimulation are equally effective at evincing intraoperative SSEPs at supramaximal intensity.