Abstract
AbstractThe phase structure of poly‐(R)‐(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB)/chitosan and poly‐(R)‐(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB‐co‐HV))/chitosan blends were studied with 1H CRAMPS (combined rotation and multiple pulse spectroscopy). 1H T1 was measured with a modified BR24 sequence that yielded an intensity decay to zero mode rather than the traditional inversion‐recovery mode. 1H T1ρ was measured with a 40‐kHz spin‐lock pulse inserted between the initial 90° pulse and the BR24 pulse train. The chemical shift scale is referenced to the methyl group of PHB as 1.27 ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) based on 1H liquid NMR of PHB. Single exponential T1 decay is observed for the β‐hydrogen of PHB or P(HB‐co‐HV) at 5.4 ppm and for the chitosan at 3.7 ppm. T1 values of the blends are either faster than or intermediate to those of the plain polymers. The T1ρ decay of β‐hydrogen is bi‐exponential. The slow T1ρ decay component is interpreted as the crystalline phase of PHB or P(HB‐co‐HV). The degree of crystallinity decreases with increasing wt % of chitosan in the blend. The fast T1ρ of β‐hydrogen and the T1ρ of chitosan in the blends either follow the same trend as or faster than the weight‐averaged values based on the T1ρ of the plain polymers. Together with the observation by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) of a melting point depression and one effective glass transition temperature in the blends, the experimental evidence strongly suggests that chitosan is miscible with either PHB or P(HB‐co‐HV) at all compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1253–1258, 2002
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call