Abstract

Corporate law understands what constitutional law does not. Minority status matters to law. Where today's constitutional jurisprudence of equal protection aspires to colorblindness, corporate law places concerns at the heart of its endeavor. The minorities of corporate law are shareholders - investors holding small, noncontrolling interests in the corporation. By contrasting corporate and constitutional law, I begin to conceptualize minority status as a legal fact. I begin by rereading the corporate canon. I show that body's concern not just for wealth maximization, but also its distribution. I reveal corporate law's deep commitment to protecting shareholders, operationalized through an elaborate common law and statutory framework. I then apply corporate law's theory of minorities to three hot button debates in the constitutional law realm: affirmative action (recently addressed by the Supreme Court in Grutter and Gratz), California's Racial Privacy Initiative (put to vote in 2003), and the demographic shift to a majority polity (already reality in California).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.