Abstract
The paper argues that the concept of trust is inevitably latent in every contractual relationship, and is best understood as a comprehensive theory and justification of contract law as both trust and contracts (more than any other legal action) are aiming toward the same universal goal of cooperation, risk-taking, and fulfillment of reasonable expectations. Contract law, per se and through its good faith doctrine, could then function as an expressive, coercive, and thus corrective legal tool, serving to symbolize, build, and internalize a culture of trust wherever it has failed to develop. Accordingly, while viewing the corporation as a nexus of contracts and as a voluntary organization based on cooperation and consent, trust can thus function as an axis that best fits corporate law, and also serves to justify it. The paper is organized as follows. Part I, briefly considers the essential role of trust. Although trust is discussed in this paper as a crucial concept in the corporate arena, some interdisciplinary insights about the axiomatic necessity of trust are cited in order to substantiate its systematic and universal role. The major theoretical claim of the article is then been outlined, namely, that the concept of trust serves as a comprehensive theory of contract law. Since the claim is that contract law is justified and also serves as the main legal bridge toward substantiating the social norm of trust, reference is also been made to the recent literature discussing the interaction between social norms and the law. Part II, illustrates the doctrinal ways by which the Israeli supreme Court integrates between the concept of trust, contract law and corporate law and substantiate the social norm of trust in the corporate context. Israeli precedent resorts rather extensively to the good faith doctrine of contract law in corporate contractual settings, explicitly justifying this recourse by reference to the trust principle, and stressing the implicit obligation of the corporation and its organs to fulfill the reasonable expectations of all corporate actors. Part III, points out some preliminary thoughts concerning specific issues in corporate and securities law that seem best suited for a research project based on the trust theory of contract and corporate law outlined here, such as issues of comparative corporate law, the search for an efficient corporate governance structure, the scope of mandatory rules in corporate law, the justification and content of the disclosure philosophy in securities regulation and legal methods for the protection of mixed investors within a corporate law model of shareholders supremacy. Part IV concludes with a discussion about the potential role of the corporation in generating an environment of universal trust, which is crucially important in the global economy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.