Minimally invasive versus transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Background:Limited data exists demonstrating the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to transcatheter (TC) closure of atrial septal defects (ASD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare post-operative outcomes of MIS versus TC repair in ASD closure.Methods:PubMed, Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception until June 2018 for randomised and observational studies comparing post-operative outcomes for MIS and TC repair. The studies were reviewed for bias using the ROBINS-I Score and pooled in a meta-analysis using STATA (version 15).Results:Six observational studies, involving 1524 patients assessing three primary and five secondary outcomes were included. Evidence suggests TC repair yielded shorter hospital stay (MD = 3.32, 95% CI 1.04–5.60) and lower rates of transient atrial fibrillation (AF) (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.20–1.15). TC repair patients also had fewer pericardial effusions (RR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54, I2 = 0.0%) and pneumothoraxes (RR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.80, I2 = 0.0%). However, TC repair results in more minor residual shunts (RR = 6.04, 95% CI 1.69–21.63 in favour of MIS, I2 = 39.0%). No differences were found for incidences of strokes (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.23–10.91, I2 = 19.3%), unexpected bleeding (RR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.19–1.04, I2 = 0.0%) and blood transfusion (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.09–1.59, I2 = 0.0%).Conclusions:MIS closure for ASD has similar outcomes compared to TC repair. However, the lack of randomised literature related to MIS versus TC repair for ASD closure warrants further evidence in the form of RCTs to further support these findings.