Abstract
Stool samples from 150 immunocompromised patients (including 120 Gastrointestinal [GI] symptomatic and 30 GI asymptomatic) suspected to have Cyclospora cayetanensis infection were examined to evaluate the validity of Milacek-Vitovec staining method in comparison with kinyoun stain for the diagnosis of cyclosporiasis. All results were confirmed with nested PCR as a gold standard. Validation parameters included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy index, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. In addition, infection intensity was compared among all positive samples. DNAs of Cyclospora oocysts were detected among 30/120 (25%) of GI symptomatic patients versus 1.7 % of GI asymptomatic (5/30). Milacek-Vitovec stain showed more validity than kinyoun with a sensitivity reached 80% versus 73.4% (28 versus 25 from 35 cases) while the specificities of showed 90.4% (104/115) versus 81.7% (94/115), respectively. Mild infection intensity was detected among 10 patients only three of them (30%) were detected by Milacek-Vitovec stain while only one (10%) was detected by Kinyoun, Moderate infection were identified among 10 patients all of them were diagnosed by Milacek-Vitovec stain and 9 (90%) was detected by Kinyoun stain. Heavy infection was detected among 15 patients all diagnosed with Milacek-Vitovec stain while 14 were detected with kinyoun.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.