Abstract

The object of the papet is to resolve a possible collision of the directives of unambiguity and communicativeness of a criminal prohibition arising from the principle of nullum crimen sine lege certa. The principle of nullum crimen follows from the rule of law, protection of trust and is an element of the principle of decent legislation, which dictates that they should be taken into account when resolving a conflict. The author is in favour of placing greater emphasis on the clarity of the prohibition, while maintaining unambiguity. He also supports the view that the incomprehensibility of the prohibition may be the basis for excluding liability in the case of an error as to the unlawfulness of an act. The text is of a dogmatic and theoretical-legal nature. It uses the method of dogmatic analysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.