Midterm results of transventricular mitral valve repair: Single-center experience

Abstract

ObjectiveThe study objective was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of transventricular mitral valve repair and its association with the initial anatomy of the mitral valve. MethodsThis nonrandomized observational study included 88 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% were men) who underwent transventricular mitral valve repair for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation between 2011 and 2017. Mitral valve function was assessed by echocardiography at 1 and 6 months and annually after the procedure. According to the location of mitral valve pathology, all patients were stratified into 4 anatomic types (A, B, C, and D). Results were assessed using Kaplan–Meier method, mixed-effects continuation ratio model, and multivariable Cox regression. ResultsMedian follow-up of 42 months (interquartile range, 27-55) was complete for 83 patients (94.3%). There were 3 late deaths: 2 cardiac and 1 noncardiac. Recurrent mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ was observed in 29 patients (33%), and 18 patients (20.5%) underwent repeat surgery. Device success was 82% in type A at 6 months and thereafter; 87%, 85%, and 75% at 6, 12, and 36 months in type B, respectively; and 53% at 1 month and 20% at 24 months in type C. Probability of postoperative mitral regurgitation progression was higher in patients with greater preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, type B pathology, and type C pathology (P < .05). Risk factors of mitral regurgitation recurrence included increased left ventricle size (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.20; P = .001) and type C pathology (hazard ratio, 5.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-19.21; P = .003). ConclusionsInitial acceptable mitral regurgitation reduction after transventricular mitral valve repair of isolated P2 prolapse was possible but found durable in only 82% at 3 years. Higher risk of mitral regurgitation recurrence occurred with complex degenerative pathology.