Abstract

According to economists from the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, the introduction of performance pay for primary and secondary school teachers would lead to an increase in Dutch GDP of one-and-a-half percent in 2070. A new epistemic practice of microeconomic forecasting undergirded this attempt to make the distant future part of the political present. Taking the construction of the economic growth potential of performance pay as a starting point, this article analyzes how microeconomic forecasting emerged in one of the world’s oldest forecasting bureaus – and to what consequences. First, it highlights the institutional preconditions for this ‘turn to micro’ in an institution that had pioneered in the field of macroeconomic forecasting. Second, the article analyzes microeconomic forecasting as a distinct epistemic practice that brings different forms of economic expertise together to make the future of educational reforms commensurable. Finally, it analyzes the political consequences of this new epistemic practice in the sense that it not only enables but simultaneously limits the provision of policy-relevant evidence. Beyond the specificities of the case, the article contributes to the sociological study of economic policy devices against the background of a predominant market bias in the STS research on economics.

Highlights

  • In 2010, a new coalition government of Christian Democrats and Conservative Liberals (VVD) announced that there would be ‘more room for performance pay, for both individuals and teams’ in Dutch education (Rijksoverheid, 2010a: 31)

  • We say in principle: ‘What we show is the relative... that it has an effect on economic growth and that you can judge policy measures relative to one another.’ (CPB economist 1)

  • The first part of the article was concerned with the question of the institutional preconditions for microeconomic forecasting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A recent calculation of the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB) demonstrates that the educational policy measures of the government contribute to the creation of jobs. For the period after the Second World War, they traced the shift from predicting trends to the development of mathematical models with which the future consequences of present-day changes in the economy – policydriven or otherwise – could be calculated These macroeconomic models came to occupy a central position in newly established forecasting bureaus and became engrained in economic policymaking in range of countries and firms (Evans, 1997, 2007; Reichmann, 2013; Van den Bogaard, 1999b). To make the future of educational reforms commensurable – and make these reforms comparable – economists from the Bureau engaged in four related activities They first stabilized the yield of foreign economic experiments so as to quantify the expected increase of the performance of Dutch students. The wider variety of knowledge claims in economics (epistemic diversity) and the specific characteristics of the Dutch educational system (institutional feasibility) are part of the context that is lost in commensuration

Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.