Abstract

The role of methane as a greenhouse gas in the concept of global climate changes is well known. Methanogens and methanotrophs are two microbial groups which contribute to the biogeochemical methane cycle in soil, so that the total emission of CH4 is the balance between its production and oxidation by microbial communities. Traditional identification techniques, such as selective enrichment and pure-culture isolation, have been used for a long time to study diversity of methanogens and methanotrophs. However, these techniques are characterized by significant limitations, since only a relatively small fraction of the microbial community could be cultured. Modern molecular methods for quantitative analysis of the microbial community such as real-time PCR (Polymerase chain reaction), DNA fingerprints and methods based on high-throughput sequencing together with different “omics” techniques overcome the limitations imposed by culture-dependent approaches and provide new insights into the diversity and ecology of microbial communities in the methane cycle. Here, we review available knowledge concerning the abundances, composition, and activity of methanogenic and methanotrophic communities in a wide range of natural and anthropogenic environments. We suggest that incorporation of microbial data could fill the existing microbiological gaps in methane flux modeling, and significantly increase the predictive power of models for different environments.

Highlights

  • Introduction published maps and institutional affilThe global methane cycle is one of the basic components of the total biogeochemical carbon cycle directly influencing the climate on Earth [1,2,3]

  • We focused mostly on publications where any correlation between physicochemical parameters of methane cycle measured in field experiments and molecular data on methanogenic and methanotrophic communities functioning in the same research sites was established

  • The analysis of all the publications presented above shows that the modern molecular methods are widespread for studying methane cycle processes

Read more

Summary

Methods

Sergey Kharitonov 1, * , Mikhail Semenov 2 , Alexander Sabrekov 3,4 , Oleg Kotsyurbenko 3,5 , Alena Zhelezova 2 and Natalia Schegolkova 1,3. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Leninskiy Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia.

Natural Sources of Methane
Wetlands
Aquatic Environments
Anthropogenic Sources of Methane
Rice Fields
Livestock Animals
Landfills
Wastewater Treatment Systems
Methanogenic and Methanotrophic Communities in Modeling the Methane Cycle
Conclusions and Outlook

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.