Abstract
Abstract. Tropical peatlands from southeast Asia are undergoing extensive drainage, deforestation and degradation for agriculture and human settlement purposes. This is resulting in biomass loss and subsidence of peat from its oxidation. Molecular profiling approaches were used to understand the relative influences of different land-use patterns, hydrological and physicochemical parameters on the state of degraded tropical peatlands. As microbial communities play a critical role in biogeochemical cascades in the functioning of peatlands, we used microbial and metabolic profiles as surrogates of community structure and functions, respectively. Profiles were generated from 230 bacterial 16 S rDNA fragments and 145 metabolic markers of 46 samples from 10 sites, including those from above and below water table in a contiguous area of 48 km2 covering five land-use types. These were degraded forest, degraded land, oil palm plantation, mixed crop plantation and settlements. Bacterial profiles were most influenced by variations in water table and land-use patterns, followed by age of drainage and peat thickness in that order. Bacterial profiling revealed differences in sites, based on the duration and frequency of water table fluctuations and on oxygen availability. Mixed crop plantations had the most diverse bacterial and metabolic profiles. Metabolic profiling, being closely associated with biogeochemical functions, could distinguish communities not only based on land-use types but also their geographic locations, thus providing a finer resolution than bacterial profiles. Agricultural inputs, such as nitrates, were highly associated with bacterial community structure of oil palm plantations, whereas phosphates and dissolved organic carbon influenced those from mixed crop plantations and settlements. Our results provide a basis for adopting molecular marker-based approaches to classify peatlands and determine relative importance of factors that influence peat functioning. Our findings will be useful in peatland management by providing a basis to focus early efforts on hydrological interventions and improving sustainability of oil palm plantations by adopting mixed cropping practices to increase microbial diversity in the long term.
Highlights
Peatlands are formed by the accumulation of partially decayed vegetation matter over over millennial timescales in low-lying areas that are frequently waterlogged due to heavy rainfall or periodic inundation (Anderson, 1964)
We focus on five land-use patterns from a contiguous study site: (a) degraded forest, which includes drained and heavily deforested peat swamp forest; (b) degraded land, which includes deforested and drained peatlands that have yet to undergo conversion for agricultural use; (c) oil palm plantation, which includes peatland area under palm plantations; (d) settlements, which includes peatland area under palm plantations interspersed with human settlements; and (e) mixed crop plantation, which includes peatland area under palm plantations, pineapple and tapioca
Oxygen availability was lower in the below water table (BWT) samples compared to above water table (AWT) samples by a factor of three or more (Fig. 2a)
Summary
Peatlands are formed by the accumulation of partially decayed vegetation matter over over millennial timescales in low-lying areas that are frequently waterlogged due to heavy rainfall or periodic inundation (Anderson, 1964). Peatlands are a highly vulnerable natural resource that cover 50–70 % of global wetlands (Finlayson et al, 1999) and sequester. S. Mishra et al.: Hydrology and land-use change affects microbial ecology of peatlands one-third of the world’s soil carbon (Freeman et al, 2012). In southeast Asia, peatlands cover an area of nearly 25 million ha and store approximately 69 Gt of carbon, which is 77 % of all the tropical peatland carbon pool (88.6 Gt), of which 65 % (57.4 Gt of carbon) is in Indonesia itself, distributed within 23.4 million ha of peatland (Page et al, 2011). Carbon density is relatively high in tropical compared to temperate or boreal peatlands; this is largely a consequence of deeper peat layers in the former, with peat thickness up to 20 m (Page et al, 2002)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have