Abstract
This study compares the effectiveness of ProTaper rotary files with ProTaper retreatment and K-files in the removal of Resilon or gutta percha (GP) from canals filled either by cold lateral condensation or thermal obturation using micro-CT. Ninety-six teeth were prepared using ProTaper files and allocated into four groups (n=24): Group-1 was filled with GP/AH-Plus and Group-2 with Resilon/RealSeal using cold lateral condensation. Group-3 was filled with GP/AH-Plus and Group-4 with Resilon/RealSeal using System B and Obtura II. The roots were scanned by micro-CT. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=12): A, retreated using ProTaper files and B, using ProTaper retreatment and K-files. The roots were scanned to calculate the volume of the remaining material. With thermal obturation, roots filled with Resilon had significantly more remaining material than GP. Obturation using thermal technique resulted in significantly less remaining material than cold condensation except Resilon retreated using ProTaper retreatment and K-files.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
