Abstract
In 2012, New York City passed a health code provision requiring that religious Jewish circumcisers, Mohelim, keep on file a signed parental consent that explains the position of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (“the department”) concerning risks of Metzizah be’Peh “with direct oral suction” (MBP). In MPB, the Mohel, a religious practitioner, very briefly places his mouth with wine on the wound to suck away a small amount of blood. The department claims this activity is responsible for a small number of cases of herpes simplex virus (HSV) in infants. This article reviews the department’s claims, as well as the claims of its challengers, and applies five secular public health ethical constructs to the department’s actions. After the analysis, the article concludes that the department has not made an ethical case to impose regulations on this religious practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare and Ethics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
