Abstract

The different anthropic activities (e.g., agriculture, industry, urbanization) incorporate contaminant compounds to aquatic ecosystems, which could affect directly and/or indirectly the biota. Management of water resources seeks to include technical-scientific criteria for decision making, promoting the conservation and preservation of these ecosystems. Considering this context, the definition of guide level values of water quality arises as a tool for aquatic biota protection. The aim of the present study was to describe the methodology of derivation of guide level values for aquatic biodiversity protection, which emerged from the work of the group Water Quality and Guide Levels for the Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity, of the Aquatic Ecosystems Evaluation and Monitoring Network (REM.AQUA-CONICET). It incorporates approaches used internationally, applying a combination of probabilistic tools based on the species sensitivity distribution (SSD), as well as the use of conservative values of extrapolated effect concentrations and associated with assessment factors, according to the available data. The methodology details the type, quantity and quality of ecotoxicological data to be considered for derivation, in addition to the steps to be followed in a flowchart. It shows the sequential decisions for obtaining the guide level values according to the information availability. The methodology also looks to generate type A and B guide values, according to the uncertainty associated with the obtaining of them. The methodology is exemplified through the species sensitivity distribution approach for atrazine and through assessment factors for the case of 2,4-D. Finally, the scope and limitations of the methodology are discussed, including those associated with the importance of incorporating a wide quantity of information of native species from different aquatic ecosystems of Argentina.

Highlights

  • Management of water resources seeks to include technical-scientific criteria for decision making, promoting the conservation and preservation of these ecosystems. Considering this context, the definition of guide level values of water quality arises as a tool for aquatic biota protection

  • The aim of the present study was to describe the methodology of derivation of guide level values for aquatic biodiversity protection, which emerged from the work of the group Water Quality and Guide Levels for the Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity, of the Aquatic Ecosystems Evaluation and Monitoring Network (REM.AQUA-CONICET)

  • It incorporates approaches used internationally, applying a combination of probabilistic tools based on the species sensitivity distribution (SSD), as well as the use of conservative values of extrapolated effect concentrations and associated with assessment factors, according to the available data

Read more

Summary

Metodologías de derivación de NG en la Argentina

A nivel nacional, la importancia del establecimiento de NG quedó explicitada dentro de los Principios Rectores de Política Hídrica de la República Argentina, que indican que la autoridad hídrica nacional debe establecer, a modo de presupuestos mínimos, “niveles guía de calidad de agua ambiente” (COHIFE 2003). La SSRH estableció niveles guía para alrededor de 70 parámetros de calidad, de acuerdo con los destinos asignados al recurso hídrico: fuente de provisión de agua para consumo humano, protección de la biota acuática, irrigación de cultivos, agua de bebida de especies de producción animal y recreación humana (SSRH 2002). La metodología propuesta por la SSRH para proteger la biota acuática recomienda que la selección de parámetros de calidad a derivar se establezca a partir de su presencia ambiental y su toxicidad en la biota. Si los datos de toxicidad aguda son escasos, la propuesta de la SSRH no permite derivar un NG-PBA para el parámetro de calidad en cuestión. Como el caso de la Autoridad Interjurisdiccional de las Cuencas de los Ríos Limay, Neuquén y Negro, al desarrollar sus NG con anterioridad a la publicación de los derivados por la SSRH, los mismos surgieron de comparación de normativas y legislaciones internacionales (AIC 1996)

Metodologías de derivación de NG en otros países y regiones
Derivación de sustancias naturales
Derivación de xenobióticos
Crustáceos Peces Plantas
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.