Abstract

The method known as the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a theoretical and methodological concept of multi-criteria analysis, is increasingly used in solving various decision-making problems. AHP is an excellent support to both the individual and group decision-making process, however, the involvement of a greater number of decision makers complicates the process and requires a different approach to when an individual decides alone. The synthesis of individual decisions within a group can be done in various ways, but the problem is how to deal with different levels of consistency when there are a number of decision makers. Thus, this paper presents some of the methods for defining the individual weights of decision makers in group AHP decision making.

Highlights

  • METHODSReceived: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 11 January 2019; Available online: 9 March 2019

  • Decision making is as old as humanity itself

  • The objective of the research presented in this paper is to indicate the difference in significance of individual decision makers in group analytical hierarchy process (AHP) synthesis

Read more

Summary

METHODS

Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 11 January 2019; Available online: 9 March 2019. Original scientific paper Abstract: The method known as the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a theoretical and methodological concept of multi-criteria analysis, is increasingly used in solving various decision-making problems. AHP is an excellent support to both the individual and group decision-making process, the involvement of a greater number of decision makers complicates the process and requires a different approach to when an individual decides alone. The synthesis of individual decisions within a group can be done in various ways, but the problem is how to deal with different levels of consistency when there are a number of decision makers. This paper presents some of the methods for defining the individual weights of decision makers in group AHP decision making

Introduction
Possibilities of defining individual weights of group members
A2 A3 A4 A5
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.