Abstract
Arc blow is a phenomenon associated with the deviation of the arc that usually occurs during arc welding of pipelines under repair. This phenomenon is most commonly observed after the pipeline has been inspected using an in-line magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tool, which magnetized the pipe wall during the inspection run. Among the different welding techniques, DC arc welding is one of the most popular in the oil and gas industry due to its versatility and relative low cost. The interaction between the magnetic field associated with the current flowing through the electrode, and the residual magnetic field in the pipeline under repair can produce arc blow. In this work, a simple method to reduce arc blow during DC arc welding of pipelines has been developed. In contrast to the methods so far available in the literature [1,2], the method proposed here gives simple rules to be followed by welders with little background on magnetism. Residual magnetic field levels from different pipelines in southern Mexico were measured in the gap after damaged pipeline sections had been cut, and in the V groove once the new pipeline sections had been inserted. Magnetic finite element simulations were performed with freeware (FEMM) for the residual magnetic field compensation using real-life pipeline dimensions and field parameters. A large number of simulations were performed, using as variables the residual magnetic field in the groove, the number of coil turns required for the residual magnetic field compensation, the DC current flowing through the coil and the electrode, the position of the coil with respect to the groove, and the pipeline wall thickness and diameter. An empirical predictive equation was developed for the compensation of the residual magnetic field from the results obtained during the simulations. Most of the procedures developed in the past propose to adjust the current in order to compensate for the magnetic field in the groove, which is a disadvantage during DC arc welding since the electrodes specifications do not cover a wide range of current values. In contrast, the method proposed herein supersedes this disadvantage by granting the possibility of properly selecting the number of coil turns and the position of the coil with respect to the groove, in order to compensate for the residual magnetic field in the groove.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.