Abstract

Method of project multicriteria decision synthesis with decision success criterion is used for realisation of construction projects which require a proper analysis of constituent parts in close relationship of components. Scheme of this method is presented in Fig 3. Multicriteria decision project may be divided into several interrelated building processes and smaller projects. On every level of the whole project, the decision of closeness to ideal solution method is made and, on the basis of the obtained results, several alternatives are chosen. On every separate level, a number of alternatives is selected by the method user. It depends on complexity of the project and on requirements of interested parties. At the last decision stage, there is performed a synthesis using the chosen alternatives and relying on their interrelations. During decision process on the intermediate stages, having eliminated irrational alternatives, effective and precise results are achieved. The developed multicriteria decision synthesis method is one of the elements of the newly created group of multicriteria decision methods. Using this method algorithm, software is prepared that entirely manages the whole decision process from database filling to calculation and result processing.

Highlights

  • Method of project multicriteria decision synthesis with decision success criterion is used for realisation of construction projects which require a proper analysis

  • Scheme of this method is presented in Fig 3

  • Multicriteria decision project may be divided into several interrelated building processes

Read more

Summary

Pagrindiniai DSSI metodu sprendziami klausimai

DSS1 metodo esme - kelitt tarpusavyje susijusi techninitt sprendimtt. kiekviename etape atrenkant tik po dvi pagal nutylejim~ (arba daugiau, tik metodo naudotojui papildomai nustacius) geriausias alternatyvas. sinteze. Jeigu mk= 1, tai netikslinga itraukti si proces~ ar projekt~ i sintezes DSS I metodu sprendziam~ uzdavini, kaip turinti vieninteli galim~ sprendimo variant~. Naudotojui pateikiami pagal santykinio reiksmingumo kriterijus i prioritetin~ eilut~ isdestyti visi galimi sprendimo variantai. Panagrinej~ projekt sintezes kompromiso kompensaciniu modeliu SKK3 metodu gaut~ rezultat~ [5] (7 lentele), kur sprendimui buvo sudaryta 9900 galim variant, matome. Kai keli variantai paga naudingumo laipsni yra labai arti vienas kito. M vienas salia kito esancius sintezuojamus variantus, kurie yra gauti vien~ po kitos keiciant tik vienos pakopos alternatyvas. Siiilomos altematyvos tarp pirm4_j4 I0 turi tik po vien

DSSt metodo modelio struktiira
Rod 12 bnuml2 bvavl2 boinl2 bmatl2 bmimal2 bvradl2 bkokl2 bminl2 bmaxl2
Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.