Abstract

Solar concentrators employed in conjunction with highly efficient micro- and meso-channel reactors offer the potential for cost-effective upgrading of the energy content of natural gas, providing a near-term path towards a future solar-fuel economy with reduced carbon dioxide emissions. To fully exploit the heat and mass transfer advantages offered by micro- and meso-channel reactors, highly active and stable natural gas steam reforming catalysts are required. In this paper, we report the catalytic performance of MgAl2O4-supported Rh (5 wt.%), Ir (5 wt.%), and Ni (15 wt.%) catalysts used for steam reforming of natural gas. Both Rh- and Ir-based catalysts are known to be more active and durable than conventional Ni-based formulations, and recently Ir has been reported to be more active than Rh for methane steam reforming on a turnover basis. Thus, the effectiveness of all three metals to perform natural gas steam reforming was evaluated in this study. Here, the Rh- and Ir-supported catalysts both exhibited higher activity than Ni for steam methane reforming. However, using simulated natural gas feedstock (94.5% methane, 4.0% ethane, 1.0% propane, and 0.5% butane), the Ir catalyst was the least active (on a turnover basis) for steam reforming of higher hydrocarbons (C2+) contained in the feedstock when operated at <750 °C. To further investigate the role of higher hydrocarbons, we used an ethane feed and found that hydrogenolysis precedes the steam reforming reaction and that C–C bond scission over Ir is kinetically slow compared to Rh. Catalyst durability studies revealed the Rh catalyst to be stable under steam methane reforming conditions, as evidenced by two 100-hour duration experiments performed at 850 and 900 °C (steam to carbon [S/C] molar feed ratio = 2.0 mol). However, with the natural gas simulant feed, the Rh catalyst exhibited catalyst deactivation, which we attribute to coking deposits derived from higher hydrocarbons contained in the feedstock. Increasing the S/C molar feed ratio from 1.5 to 2.0 reduced the deactivation rate and stable catalytic performance was demonstrated for 120 h when operated at 850 °C. However, catalytic deactivation was observed when operating at 900 °C. While improvements in steam reforming performance can be achieved through choice of catalyst composition, this study also highlights the importance of considering the effect of higher hydrocarbons contained in natural gas, operating conditions (e.g., temperature, S/C feed ratio), and their effect on catalyst stability. The results of this study conclude that a Rh-supported catalyst was developed that enables very high activities and excellent catalytic stability for both the steam reforming of methane and other higher hydrocarbons contained in natural gas, and under conditions of operation that are amendable to solar thermochemical operations.

Highlights

  • 95% of industrial hydrogen in the United States is currently produced through natural gas reforming [1,2]

  • The methods explored included the use of (1) simulated natural gas feedstock, (2) separate methane and ethane model feeds to elucidate contributions from each, (3) catalyst durability tests, and (4) evaluation over a wide temperature range. These conditions are all of particular interest for solar thermochemical applications where highly active and durable catalysts are required for a range of conditions

  • We report additional catalyst characterization include Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) as well as the hydrogen adsorption over the temperature range of interest for natural gas steam reforming (i.e., 600–850 ◦ C)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

95% of industrial hydrogen in the United States is currently produced through natural gas reforming [1,2]. The product of natural gas reforming is a mixture of H2 , CO, and CO2 ,. (referred to as syngas), which is a versatile and useful feedstock for producing a number of industrially relevant chemical commodities such as methanol, dimethyl ether [3], and Fischer-Tropsch products [4,5]. Reaction 1 is the steam methane reforming (SMR) reaction, which is endothermic and requires high temperatures (e.g., 600–850 ◦ C) for operation. Reaction 2 is the reaction for steam reforming of higher hydrocarbons (C2+ ). Both the SMR (Reaction 1) and water-gas-shift (Reaction 3)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call