Abstract

Reactions of [CpMCl(&mgr;(2)-SH)(2)MCpCl] (1, M = Ir; 2, M = Rh; Cp = eta(5)-C(5)Me(5)) with excess FeCl(2).4H(2)O in THF gave the paramagnetic trinuclear clusters [(CpM)(2)(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)FeCl(2)] (3, M = Ir; 4, M = Rh), which were further converted into the dicationic 78e(-) pentanuclear bow-tie cluster [(CpIr)(2)(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)Fe(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)(IrCp)(2)](2+) (5) by treatment with NaBPh(4). When complex 1 was allowed to react with CoCl(2) and NiCl(2).6H(2)O or Ni(cod)(2) (cod = cyclooctadiene), the related pentanuclear 79e(-) and 80e(-) bow-tie clusters [(CpIr)(2)(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)M(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)(IrCp)(2)](2+) (6, M = Co; 7, M = Ni) were obtained directly, respectively. Cyclic voltammograms of 5[BPh(4)](2), 6[BPh(4)](2), and 7[BPh(4)](2) showed two reversible reduction waves at -0.25 to -0.43 V and -1.04 to -1.34 V. In both redox couples, the redox potential was in the order Fe < Co < Ni. One-electron reduction of clusters 5[BPh(4)](2), 6[BPh(4)](2), and 7[BPh(4)](2) with Co(eta(5)-C(5)H(5))(2) gave the corresponding monocationic pentanuclear 79-81e(-) bow-tie clusters [(CpIr)(2)(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)M(&mgr;(3)-S)(2)(IrCp)(2)](+) (8, M = Fe; 9, M = Co; 10, M = Ni). The molecular structures of 3, 4, 5[BPh(4)](2).CH(2)Cl(2), 6[CoCl(3)(NCMe)](2), 7[NiCl(4)].CH(2)Cl(2), 8[BPh(4)], 9[BPh(4)], and 10[BPh(4)] were unambiguously determined by X-ray diffraction study. The structures of the pentanuclear bow-tie cluster cores remarkably changed stepwise as the core electrons increased from 78 to 81. Two of the M-Ir (M = Fe, Co) bonds in the 79e(-) clusters 6 and 8 show significant elongation in comparison with the Fe-Ir bonds in the 78e(-) cluster 5. Two different types of the bow-tie structures were observed for the 80e(-) clusters 7 and 9. Cluster 7 has a Z-shaped metal core with only two Ni-Ir bonds, while in cluster 9, the six metal-metal bonds in the bow-tie structure are retained with slight elongation of the Co-Ir bonds in comparison with the corresponding dication 6. The 81e(-) cluster 10 has two normal Ni-Ir bonds and one long Ni-Ir bonding interaction with the fourth nonbonding Ni-Ir contact. This structural variation is interpreted in terms of the total electron counts and molecular orbital calculations of the clusters.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.