Abstract

This study evaluates the image quality of lower extremity CT venography reconstructed with orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) in patients with unilateral or bilateral metallic prostheses in the hip or knee. This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. Twenty-nine patients of lower extremity CT with 51 metallic hip or knee prostheses were reconstructed to both standard CT images and O-MAR images. The subjective image quality and vessel conspicuity for both images were evaluated by two readers using five-point scales (0-4). Vessel conspicuity scores of 3 or 4 were considered diagnostically acceptable. Image noise was measured in the air and subcutaneous fat. O-MAR images showed significantly higher scores of subjective image quality (p < .001) and vessel conspicuity (p = .002) than standard CT images. Diagnostic acceptance of vessel conspicuity was not significantly different between O-MAR images and standard CT images (p = 1.000). O-MAR images showed significantly less image noise than conventional CT images (p < .001 for both air and subcutaneous fat). O-MAR may be an effective solution for the metal artifacts in lower extremity CT venography; however, the distance between prostheses and vessels affects the diagnostic acceptance in patients with metallic hip or knee prostheses. Level 4, Case Series.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call