Abstract

The broad applications of cellular manufacturing make flowline manufacturing cell scheduling problems with sequence dependent family setup times a core topic in the field of scheduling. Due to computational complexity, almost all published studies focus on using permutation schedules to deal with this problem. To explore the potential effectiveness of treating this argument using non-permutation schedules, three prominent types of metaheuristics—a simulated annealing, a genetic algorithm and a tabu search—are proposed and empirically evaluated. The experimental results demonstrate that in general, the improvement made by non-permutation schedules over permutation schedules for the due-date-based performance criteria were significantly better than that for the completion-time-based criteria. The results of this study will provide practitioners a guideline as to when to adopt a non-permutation schedule, which may exhibit better performance with additional computational efforts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call