Meta Analysis Study of Complications Following Repair of Mid Penile Hypospadius using Different Surgical Techniques

Abstract

Abstract Background Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital defects affecting the external male genitalia. The incidence is 1 in 250 male newborns, although its incidence seems to be increasing. Hypospadias is defined as an insufficient development of the urethral fold and the ventral foreskin, with or without penile curvature. The urethral opening is located more proximally anywhere between the tip of the penis and the perineum. Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to determine the best surgical technique with the least complications for repair of mid-penile hypospadias. Materials and Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance to the recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement. MOOSE is a reporting checklist for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers of Meta-analysis of interventional and observational studies. According to International committee of medical journal association (ICJME), reviewers must report their findings according to each of the items listed in those checklists. Results Fistula is less common after Preputial island flap technique. Fistula is more common with Modified koyanagi technique. Meatal stenosis is less common after Mathieu and Preputial island flap techniques. Meatal stenosis is more common after TIP technique. Wound Dehiscence is not common after lateral based flap and modified koyanagi and Onlay island flap techniques. Neourethral Stricture is not common after lateral based flap and Mathieu and Onlay island flap techniques. Conclusion The Mathieu and Preputial island flap techniques for mid-penile hypospadias reconstruction are associated with a significantly lower risk for postoperative urethral stricture and may be the preferred method for hypospadias. However, the clinical implications of the results can be discussed because the risk of stricture in all procedures was low. The implications for research are obvious because there had been no studies that provided firm guidelines on the best method for the operative intervention for hypospadias. Further trials are still needed to confirm our findings.