Abstract

Mesoporous ZSM-22 zeolite (TON structure) is prepared by controlled silicon extraction in aqueous NaOH under different conditions of concentration, temperature, and time. The first challenge is to synthesize a pure ZSM-22 sample, since ZSM-5 and cristobalite impurities are hard to avoid. For this purpose, hydrothermal syntheses in autoclaves of 30–1000 cm3 using tumbling or magnetic mixing were conducted. The parent (calcined) and alkaline-treated samples are characterised by XRD, AAS, N2 and Ar adsorption, TEM, 27Al MAS NMR, and FTIR. The introduction of mesoporosity in ZSM-22 crystals is not straightforward due to their peculiar characteristics: the rod-like morphology of their small crystallites, the one-dimensionality of the ellipsoidal micropore system, and an uneven Al distribution. Compared to other zeolite frameworks such as MFI, the generation of up to 95 m2 g−1 of (both inter- and intracrystalline) mesopore surface area by NaOH treatment leads to a sizeable drop of the micropore volume (down to 0.006 cm3 g−1), attributed to blocking by re-deposited Al species. A subsequent mild acid treatment in aqueous HCl restores ca. 90% of the original micropore volume and increases the mesopore surface area to 114 m2 g−1. However, due to the particular Al distribution in the parent ZSM-22 crystals, only 37% of the original Brønsted acidity is recovered. A new descriptor ‘desilication efficiency’ is introduced to relate the mesopore area generated to the mass of zeolite dissolved. In the case of ZSM-22 nanorods and ferrierite platelets, the desilication efficiency is relatively low compared to ZSM-5, most likely due to the crystal morphology of the former two zeolites. The auxiliary mesoporosity developed in ZSM-22 brings new prospects to catalytic applications of the zeolite due to the extensive creation of pore mouths in the hierarchical sample.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call