Abstract
Catalyzed oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions (OER and ORR, respectively) are of particular significance in many energy conversion and storage processes. During the last decade, they emerged as potential routes to sustain the ever-growing needs of the future clean energy market. Unfortunately, the state-of-the-art OER and ORR electrocatalysts, which are based on noble metals, are noticeably limited by a generally high activity towards one type of reaction only, high costs and relatively low abundance. Therefore, the development of (bi)functional low-cost non-noble metal or metal-free electrocatalysts is expected to increase the practical energy density and drastically reduce the production costs. Owing to their pore properties and high surface areas, mesoporous materials show high activity towards electrochemical reactions. Among all synthesis methods available for the synthesis of non-noble mesoporous metal oxides, the hard-templating (or nanocasting) approach is one of the most attractive in terms of achieving variable morphology and porosity of the materials. In this review, we thus focus on the recent advances in the design, synthesis, characterization and efficiency of non-noble metal OER and ORR electrocatalysts obtained via the nanocasting route. Critical aspects of these materials and perspectives for future developments are also discussed.
Highlights
Over the last 50 years, our energy needs have almost exclusively relied on the use of fossil fuels or intermittent renewable energy supplies
We focus on the recent advances in the design, synthesis, characterization and efficiency of non-noble metal oxygen reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reactionand (ORR) electrocatalysts obtained via the nanocasting route
Ordered mesoporous silica materials are the templates of choice and among this vast family, mainly two different types are used: MCM-41 and SBA-15 that exhibit a pore structure made out of a 2D
Summary
Over the last 50 years, our energy needs have almost exclusively relied on the use of fossil fuels or intermittent renewable energy supplies. 2019, 7, 98 2019, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW directly dependent on the efficiency of the electrochemical reactions taking place at the electrodes the charging/discharging processes, they are still not comprehensively and/or understood [6,7,8,9]. The main point is to make OER much more efficient limiting is reaction in thereaction overall in process, i.e., as compared to compared hydrogen evolution reactions (HER). Both suffer from slow kinetics, high overpotential and poor reversibility [19]. Air batteries, for example [9,10,11,12,17]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have