Abstract

This essay traces out the importance of the poetic and creative use of language to Merleau-Ponty’s ontology. Why Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment inevitably had to turn towards a poetic use of language and to see the overlap between literature and philosophy in articulating an ontology is examined. The tie between a deeper sense of metaphor and the structure of the flesh of the world is explored. The attempt to articulate the latent background of perception leads to the essential role of what will be called the “physiognomic imagination”, which is a different use of imagination than “make-believe” and is key to the unfolding of the depths of perceptual sense. Understanding the efficacy of the literary use of language to the manifestation of further sense also requires an understanding of the temporality of the institution and the ongoing becoming of the real in Merleau-Ponty’s ontology. This essay argues that Merleau-Ponty’s turn to poetic language was both a source of his insights for ontology and the way that he came to express his own philosophy as a necessary outcome of fidelity to the phenomenology of perception. Given the parallel structure of the flesh of the world and metaphor, the dialogical nature of the perceptual encounter with the “voice of silence”, and the increasing importance of physiognomic imaginations, the temporality of institution and “sensible ideas” to his indirect ontology, the literary and poetic use of language had to assume a central role in the articulation of the flesh ontology as well as to the further manifestation of sense. This assertion is meant to rectify the reading and commentaries that fail to see this necessity and instead interpret Merleau-Ponty’s increasing use of poetic language as merely a residue of his evolving writing style and not as the necessary outcome of his ontological insights. This essay is also meant to address phenomenologists who fail to turn to literature and the poetic expression of embodied ontology as failing to carry forth Merleau-Ponty’s revisioning of philosophy and centrality of perception and embodiment.

Highlights

  • The role of poetic language in expressing the depths of sense in perceptual life, present in Merleau-Ponty’s earliest phenomenology, becomes increasingly more central as he develops the ontology of the flesh

  • His promise after finishing the Phenomenology of Perception to explore to a greater degree the phenomenology of imagination and its key role in perception leads to a greater overlap between his “indirect” ontology and literature

  • Merleau-Ponty’s debt to Proust, Claudel, Valéry, Simone, Balzac, and other literary figures is discussed by him continually and this fact suggests the fruitful interplay between a phenomenological ontology and a close reading of literary texts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The role of poetic language in expressing the depths of sense in perceptual life, present in Merleau-Ponty’s earliest phenomenology, becomes increasingly more central as he develops the ontology of the flesh. His promise after finishing the Phenomenology of Perception to explore to a greater degree the phenomenology of imagination and its key role in perception leads to a greater overlap between his “indirect” ontology and literature. Will be the conclusion drawn by this essay that a truly embodied phenomenology needs to both turn towards literature and express itself through a creative or literary/poetic use of language to do justice to the depths of sense and the ontology to which it leads

The World’s Gestures in the Prereflective Perceptual Dialogue
The Power of Literary and Poetic Language
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call