Merleau‐Ponty and Nagarjuna – Ethics Within the Self of the No‐Self

Abstract

AbstractThis essay explores the concept of the self in the philosophies of Nagarjuna and Merleau‐Ponty by examining how it is that, according to them, the self is empty and only conventionally real rather than intrinsically so. By analyzing the similarities between their philosophies, the essay aims to shed light on new ways of understanding perception, ethics, and our relationships with others. It will include an analysis of the no‐self and the emptiness of entities, as well as an analysis of Merleau‐Ponty's writings and philosophy to see how it is that, according to him, in order to better understand ourselves, we must understand the reality of our intersubjectivity and intertwining with the world. It will clearly be shown that Merleau‐Ponty's existential phenomenology and the Madhyamikan school of thought coincide and offer powerful moral philosophies, while seeing the world as being completely separate from the self, distorts both our notions of ourselves and the world we are interconnected with. Virtue must be sought in samsara (perpetually being born into the world) and sunyata (emptiness that is itself empty of inherent existence), for samsara and nirvana (the end of karma) are one.[Correction added on 03 April 2023, after the first online publication: First two sentences of the Abstract have been modified.]