Mentorship in Urology Residency Programs in the United States

Abstract

To characterize the status of mentorship programs for Urology residencies in the United States, highlight the importance of mentorship in the career of a urology resident, and identify the obstacles of implementing a mentorship program. With Internal Review Board exemption and approval from the Society of Academic Urologists, a survey was sent to the Program Directors of the Urology Residency programs in the United States containing questions about the presence and structure of a mentorship program in their department. Response rate was 54%. Seventy-five percent of respondents approved of formal mentorship programs. Fifty-eight percent of respondents had 1 established. Five percent of programs had an official training course for faculty mentors. Thirty-eight percent of programs had no requirement on mentor and/or mentee meeting frequency. The most common reason for not having a formal mentorship program was because the program felt that informal mentorship sufficed. While the vast majority of Program Directors for Urology Residency programs in the United States approve of formal mentorship programs, only a little over half have 1 established. Programs should strive to create a formal mentorship program in their residency programs due to their recognized importance.