Abstract

We investigated “musical effort” with an internationally renowned, classical, pianist while playing, listening, and imagining music. We used pupillometry as an objective measure of mental effort and fMRI as an exploratory method of effort with the same musical pieces. We also compared a group of non-professional pianists and non-musicians by the use of pupillometry and a small group of non-musicians with fMRI. This combined approach of psychophysiology and neuroimaging revealed the cognitive work during different musical activities. We found that pupil diameters were largest when “playing” (regardless of whether there was sound produced or not) compared to conditions with no movement (i.e., “listening” and “imagery”). We found positive correlations between pupil diameters of the professional pianist during different conditions with the same piano piece (i.e., normal playing, silenced playing, listen, imagining), which might indicate similar degrees of load on cognitive resources as well as an intimate link between the motor imagery of sound-producing body motions and gestures. We also confirmed that musical imagery had a strong commonality with music listening in both pianists and musically naïve individuals. Neuroimaging provided evidence for a relationship between noradrenergic (NE) activity and mental workload or attentional intensity within the domain of music cognition. We found effort related activity in the superior part of the locus coeruleus (LC) and, similarly to the pupil, the listening and imagery engaged less the LC–NE network than the motor condition. The pianists attended more intensively to the most difficult piece than the non-musicians since they showed larger pupils for the most difficult piece. Non-musicians were the most engaged by the music listening task, suggesting that the amount of attention allocated for the same task may follow a hierarchy of expertise demanding less attentional effort in expert or performers than in novices. In the professional pianist, we found only weak evidence for a commonality between subjective effort (as rated measure-by-measure) and the objective effort gauged with pupil diameter during listening. We suggest that psychophysiological methods like pupillometry can index mental effort in a manner that is not available to subjective awareness or introspection.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMusical EffortThe piano is not an easy instrument to master. It requires a lifetime of extended practice and early (possibly during childhood) onset of training to achieve a high level of performance

  • Musical EffortThe piano is not an easy instrument to master

  • Pupil sizes were smaller, when listening to all three pieces, for the professional pianist and largest for the non-musicians. This could be due to spurious pupil size differences across the groups and PP, we find this unlikely and we would like to suggest that these results might be indicative of expertise so that the amount of attention allocated for the same task is always lower in the expert or better performers than in novices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Musical EffortThe piano is not an easy instrument to master. It requires a lifetime of extended practice and early (possibly during childhood) onset of training to achieve a high level of performance. There is the need of dividing attention over the control of complex, synchronized, sequences of finger positions and movements (Mikumo, 1994) and paying attention to the obtained auditory stimuli Such a fine and precise motor control of hands and fingers require cognitive and motor control, guiding constant adjustments of bodily actions for both the execution and preparation of the following movements during the different passages of a musical piece, depending on the level of cognitive and motoric demands in performing the movements. We assume that playing the piano—or any musical instrument professionally—requires mental resources or ‘‘mental effort,’’ as Kahneman (1973) labeled it originally. Such a type of neurocognitive effort is distinguishable from physical effort, though it has clear analogies with it

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call