Abstract

BackgroundThere are conflicting reports on the effects of decreased estrogen levels on mandibular bone microarchitecture, and whether these effects are consistent throughout the mandible is unclear and may have important implications for treatment planning. PurposeThe goal of this study was to evaluate trabecular and cortical bone microstructure in the mandibular condyle and the mandibular basal bone and compare these sites between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Study Design, Setting, SampleParticipants were recruited for a cross-sectional cohort study at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Each participant had CBCT taken of their mandibular condyles and of the basal bone. Exclusion criteria for the population included a) current chemo- or immunotherapy; b) history of bisphosphonate or other osteoporosis therapy; and c) currently pregnant, nursing, or on hormonal birth control. Independent VariableThe predictor variables are menopausal status (before or after menopause) and mandibular region of interest (condyle/basal bone). Outcome VariableParameters of interest included the following indicators of bone quality: trabecular bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular thickness, trabecular number, trabecular separation, cortical BVF, cortical thickness, and cortical porosity. CovariatesCovariates included demographic variables such as age, estrogen levels, and ethnicity. AnalysesQuantitative microstructure analyses were conducted on CBCT images, and differences between groups for continuous measures (including age) were assessed with unpaired t-test, and demographic variables were assessed by Chi-square. Statistical significance was recorded at p<0.05. ResultsThe premenopausal and postmenopausal groups each had 31 participants, with the following average age: premenopausal= 43.9±6.9 vs. postmenopausal = 57.5±7.6 years old; p<0.001, and estrogen levels: premenopausal =91.77±80.13 pg/ml vs. postmenopausal= 41.44±61.62 pg/ml; p <0.01). Postmenopausal women had significantly greater condylar trabecular separation (0.61±0.18 vs 0.47±0.11 mm; p<0.001) and lower trabecular number (1.03±0.18 vs 1.21±0.19 1/mm; p<0.001) compared to premenopausal women. There were no significant differences in the basal bone microarchitectural parameters between the menopausal groups. Conclusion and RelevanceMenopause is associated with mandibular condylar trabecular bone loss but has minimal effects on the mandibular basal bone. This may have important ramifications for treatment planning in advanced age individuals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call