Abstract
One of the long-standing and challenging issues that memory research continues to confront is the dilemma of localizing a complex function in an exquisitely anatomically differentiated central nervous system. Is memory a mental function that can be identified with an isolated neural structure or specific groups of neurons? Traditionally, this question has been framed by psychological inquiry. The 19th century school of “faculty psychology” divided mental processes into separate and distinct human attributes such as “courage” and “ambition,” encouraging the anatomist, Gall (1), to impose the multiple attributes of human psychological make-up onto a physical map of the brain. Although this naive view of psychological process was widely repudiated, it nevertheless spawned the powerful and ultimately validated idea that specific functions can be relegated to particular brain structures or regions. Clinical observations in patients with focal lesions in the last century clearly established a correspondence between specific symptoms and localized regions of injury, most notably left hemisphere frontal sites with expression of speech (2) and left hemisphere posterior temporal lobe sites with speech …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.